|
|||||||
 |
|||||||
|
|
TABLE OF CONTENTS: http://www.marxists.de/middleast/brenner/index.htm
]
DATE: SEPT. 21, 2005
|
|
Zionism in the Age of the Dictators
Lenni Brenner: Zionism in the Age of the Dictators.
|
|
Last updated on 1.7.2002
|
From: reportersnotebook <msantom629@aol.com>
To: RePortersNoteBook@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [RePortersNoteBook] Two Revisionists Debate
Date: May 12, 2008 1:37 PM
May 2008 Two Revisionists Debate I'm going to have to disagree-partially. While I certainly do agree that other groups participated in the hoax (they had good reasons to, as we shall see) the idea that the Jews just helped themselves to somebody else's fraud is untenable. I think it would be very difficult to determine at this point just exactly where the story of 'gassed' Jews first originated. To my mind, the point is essentially irrelevant. The British and Soviets are, of course, master liars. One need merely recall the British propaganda campaigns of the First World War. The Soviet communists (mainly Jews in those days) were always liars on principle. This is undisputed. However, your thesis stumbles over some simple considerations. The 'gas chamber' hoax could never have become established as fact in the international arena without the stamp of the Nuremberg kangaroo court. Who was responsible for Nuremberg? Remember that the Americans and British (particularly the latter) were initially cool toward the idea of a 'war crimes' trial. Churchill simply wanted to shoot the defeated German leaders. It was Jewish organizations which sold-and then staffed- the war crimes tribunals. Specifically, it was the Robinson brothers of the Institute For Jewish Affairs of the World Jewish Congress who first proposed the idea. David 'Mickey' Marcus was the man in charge of picking all the personnel for both the Far East and Nuremberg trials. (Marcus was later influential in orchestrating the partition of Palestine vote at the United Nations during Thanksgiving week of 1948.) According to Hungarian author Louis Marschalko in The World Conquerors, out of 3000 total personnel at the trials, 2400 were Jewish. All of this indicates a very definite controlling power operating behind the facade of the Americans, British, French and Soviet Russians. The situation might be analogized to the Balfour Declaration of the First World War and the subsequent Paris Peace Conference. Everyone knows that the British government issued the Declaration on its own letterhead. It is also known that numerous high English officials, such as Lords Alfred Milner and Robert Cecil participated in the drafting of the famous words, as did Jan Christian Smuts, South African Prime Minister, Leopold Amery and other Englishmen. But it is also documented that Zionists on both sides of the Atlantic ocean, such as Louis Brandeis, Felix Frankfurter, Benjamin Cohen, Stephen Wise, Chaim Weizmann, Nahum Sokolow, Moses Gaster, Joseph Kessler and others, were the real drafters behind the scenes. So too at Nuremberg. Similarly, at the Paris Peace Conference following the war, the Entente was formally in charge but very powerful Jewish interests operated with the great powers demanding, and getting, a League of Nations, minorities treaties and a mandate over Palestine in which the Balfour Declaration was included in the San Remo Conference of April, 1920. The Jews at Nuremberg were operating much as the Jews at Paris is in 1919. One must also recall that it was a Jew, John Woods Short, who was the hangman at Nuremberg. It was a Jew, Wolf Frank, who read out the sentences to the convicted defendants. The Germans were hung in the middle of the Jewish high holidays in October, 1946-just before the Day of Atonement. Do you really believe that it was the Americans, the British, the French or the Soviet Russians who planned these amazing happenstances? If you doubt the Jewish control behind the scenes I would point out that it was an American judge, Wennersturm, who declared after one of the subsidiary NMT trials that over 90% of the personnel at the proceedings had been 'foreign born' (an obvious reference to Jews). Recently the Nuremberg diaries of Senator Thomas Dodd have been published by Senator Christopher Dodd, his son. Dodd had been an assisstant prosecutor at Nuremberg. His diaries contain some very blunt passages about the overwhelming preponderance of the Jews at Nuremberg-and the danger that the general public might conclude that Nuremberg was a Jewish 'revenge' trial. All of this is sufficient, I believe, to demolish your position that responsibility for the hoax lies alsewhere than on the tribe. I might further point out that the end of the Second World War has seen an avalanche of Holocaust propaganda produced for television and the movies on the alleged extermination of the Jews. Needless to say little, if any, of this propaganda was produced by the national governments who sat as judges at Nuremberg. I do think you have a point when you say that the victors of the war had motivations of their own for participating in the hoax. The Americans, British and Soviet Russians had committed enormous crimes of their own during and after the war. Thus, all the wailing about the sad fate of the Jews served to camoflauge those crimes and divert attention elsewhere. Among those crimes were the massive aerial bombardments of civilians started by the British, the mass expulsions and mass rapes in the east by the Red Army and its Jewish political commissars, Operation Keelhaul perpetrated by tha Amerians and British, the use of German soldiers as slave labor after the war by the French, Eisenhower's death camps for 'Disarmed Enemy Forces',etc. There is also a more fundamental reason for collaborating with the jews in the hoax. Jewish financial power has the capacity to destroy any country which dares oppose it. All governments, then and now, are deeply in debt to this financial power. This fact serves as a veto on any unwillingness to go along. I find you very perceptive on the psychological reasons people believe in the extermination story. The death scenes in the camps at war's end are a powerful inducement to believe. People are also plain afraid of the implications of the hoax if the story is proved false. I believe that the 'gas chamber' hoax does indeed validate the Protocols of Zion. After all, if the Jews have lied about the one, why would they not lie about the other? ('False in one thing; false in all things', as the lawyers say.) I think that this little exchange of views is very helpful in elucidating who really bears the responsibility for the hoax. I would only add that if the groups promoting the hoax after conclusive exposure of its falsity has been provided continue on their course, then they have become 'accessories after the fact'-and therefore as culpable as those originally involved in its promotion and creation. --- END --- |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
[
[
00
00
 | DISCLAIMER |
| |
|
| The views expressed
herein are the writers' own and do NOT host of this website. ACHTUNG: Nach § 130 StGB sind Schriften von der Verfolgung ausgenommen, die sich gegen verfassungs- und strafgesetzwidrige Bestrebungen richten. [01][02] |
.... THE END